The Backbone of IT Services, Not Technological Breakthroughs
Indian IT service firms - TCS, Infosys, Wipro, and HCL- have built global empires by delivering cost-effective, scalable, and reliable solutions to some of the world's largest companies. From ERP implementation management to legacy system management and business process automation, they've perfected the art of execution. Their success is unarguable - millions of employees, billions of dollars in revenue, and a dominant position in India's tech economy.
But here's the reality: these firms are not incubators of innovation. They are built to execute, not create. The caricature that they work like giant factories of process-oriented coders churning out predictable work with little room for creativity - isn't an impression. It's true to a great extent.
The "Body Shop" Model: Efficiency Rather Than Originality
These companies expanded by offering low-cost, skilled manpower for massive but well-defined IT work. Take SAP implementation as an example. A multinational firm needs to computerize its supply chain, and an IT firm like TCS will deploy thousands of programmers to install SAP modules, move data, and effect a smooth transition. It's mission-critical work, but not highly creative.
The template is already designed by SAP - TCS simply installs it.
The same holds true for automation. Writing scripts to automate a financial transaction or streamlining an inventory system is not invention, but being efficient. Indian IT companies are good at following blueprints, meeting deadlines, and being cost-effective. But inventing something new? That is not their forte.
And it's not just about project work - it's deeply embedded in company culture. Employees, usually recent graduates of Indian engineering schools, learn to stay within tight templates, SLAs (service-level agreements), and value stability over risk-taking. A typical Infosys programmer can spend years learning ABAP code for SAP or building robotic process automation (RPA) robots. Their technical skills are narrow but deep. Put them in a scenario where they must innovate and not just implement, and they'll fail - not because they're not smart, but because their whole career has been about implementing within constraints.
The Numbers Don't Lie: Indian IT Firms Are Not Betting on Innovation
Take R&D spending, a good measure of how much an organization is invested in innovation:
- 🇮🇳 TCS: ~1 % of revenue
- 🇮🇳 Wipro: ~2 % of revenue
- 🇮🇳 Infosys :~1 % of revenue
- 🇮🇳 HCL: ~1% of revenue
- 🇺🇸 IBM & Microsoft: ~12%
- 🇺🇸 Google & NVIDIA: ~15–20% of revenue
- 🇺🇸 Oracle : ~17% of revenue
- 🇺🇸 Intel : ~20% of revenue
- 🇺🇸 AMD : ~25% of revenue
- 🇨🇳 Huawei : ~21% of revenue
- 🇨🇳 ZTE: ~20% of revenue
- 🇨🇳 BAIDU: ~18% of revenue
- 🇨🇳 Tencent: ~11% of revenue
That difference is enormous. While companies like NVIDIA are revolutionizing computing paradigms with world of AI powered by their GPUs, Indian IT firms primarily focus on implementing established solutions for their clients; implementing tried-and-tested solutions for client work. Even in the realm of seemingly advanced AI, their contributions tend to involve adapting innovations developed by others rather than creating their own.
Even their patents attest to this. Of course, they do file thousands of them every year, but they are largely incremental - incremental tweaks on existing systems, not technology leaps. Place that against firms that are disrupting industries, like OpenAI with big language models or Tesla with self-driving cars. Indian IT companies are not disruption companies.
DeepSeek may well have been a product of India, were it not for the IT sector's deep-seated aversion to research funding.
A Business Model That Kills Innovation
The organization of such firms officially discourages innovation. They operate on contract-to-work, whereby the work is specified by the clients:
- "Migrate this system."
- "Resolve these issues."
- "Maintain this software."
No room to experiment, to innovate. The primary goal? Get done on time, mitigate risk, and maximize billable hours. That is the exact opposite of an innovative culture.
Compare this with firms such as Apple, Google, or Tesla, where individuals are motivated to challenge conventional thinking, try out prototypes, and experiment. Risk-taking is not rewarded but penalized in Indian IT firms. Career growth depends on delivery numbers and customer satisfaction and not innovative thinking. Over time, the creativity spark is extinguished.
Even bootcamps continue to do this. Java,.NET, SAP—hands-on skills for client projects—are what they focus on, but hardly any time is given to design thinking, product development, or independent research. That's why an engineer who has spent a few years of his life optimizing databases at Wipro might draw a blank when asked to generate a disruptive product idea. He's been taught to think within the box.
The "innovation" that they have is insignificant
Others argue that these firms are innovating on their own terms, pointing to initiatives like:
TCS's Ignite program (machine-learning technology for drug discovery), Infosys's Finacle (digital banking platforms), HCL's DRYiCE suite (autonomous IT operations).
But honestly? These endeavors are infinitesimally small and not even path breaking and mostly replicating some model from some other company. These are also very small compared to these firms' sheer scale. These are companies that have hundreds of thousands of staff and billions of revenue. These are teeny-tiny sideshows they're working on, not major business drivers. They're not building industry-advancing technology; they're small-scale productivity gains within tried-and-true models.
In the meantime, the bulk of their staff is still trapped in maintenance, implementation, and support jobs - performing vital but unoriginal work.
The Exception, Rather Than the Rule
That does not mean that professionals from these organizations cannot innovate. Some engineers, who started work at TCS, Infosys, or Wipro, quit to start successful companies and some go on to join Googles, Microsofts of the world and succeed. That's despite, not because, of their IT services track record.
For each TCS employee who gets to transition into a state-of-the-art AI research position, there are hundreds of thousands trapped in routine IT projects - not because they are not talented, but because the system does not encourage them to innovate. .
Conclusion: Execution Powerhouses, Innovation Stragglers
So are Indian IT companies earning their reputation as effective but un-innovative?
Yes. Their whole business model, culture, and training system are all designed to prioritize disciplined execution over sacrificing originality. They are great at what they do- delivering cost-effective, scalable IT services to big multinational companies.
But are they at any level disrupting industries, inventing new technologies, or driving core innovation?
They're not even in the ballpark of the types of companies that actually push technology to its limits.
The bottom line?
Call TCS if you need something repaired.
Call someone else if you want a new technology breakthrough.
Comments
Post a Comment